Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Stewart v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00210
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Demetrious Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2013cv00098
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Demetrious Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barren v. Kohn et al
as 2:2012cv02023
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, Stewart Bell, Maryan Brady and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Robin Barren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Stewart Center et al
as 2:2011cv00226
Defendant:
City Of Las Vegas, Detention Center, I.F.M. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward W. Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Bell
as 3:2010cv00802
Defendant:
Stewart Bell
Plaintiff:
Edwin Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart
as 2:2010cv01922
Plaintiff:
Roger Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2010cv00262
Defendant:
Stewart L. Bell and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Delask Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. McDaniels et al
as 2:2009cv01784
Petitioner:
Reginald Stewart
Respondent:
McDaniels and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Schulnick et al
as 2:2009cv01185
Plaintiff:
Reginald Stewart
Defendant:
Howard Schulnick, Dwight Nevens, Harry Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2009cv01063
Petitioner:
Charles Eric Stewart
Respondent:
State Of Nevada and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
