Cases 41 - 50 of 298
Scott v. Miller et al
as 3:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Mike (John) Henley, Robert Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Cheney
as 3:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott
Defendant:
Coach Cheney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Holtz et al
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Holtz, Taitano, Omler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Frazier et al
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Frenandeis A. Frazier, Lt. Miller, Perry Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Michell et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Melissa Michell, Gaylene Fukagawa, Vanessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Robert Elliott, Samisoni Taukitoko, Bradley Sandefur and others
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Dept of Corr. Director, W.S.C.C. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeder v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Christopher Scott Reeder
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garren v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ronald Garren
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Scott Davis, M. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Paul Scott Nelson
Defendant:
Daniels, Mr.- Scally, Miss Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burdsal v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burdsal
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Tim Garrett, Kara LeGrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
