Cases 41 - 50 of 3,241
Aquino-Pacheco v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50341
Petitioner:
Tomas Aquino-Pacheco
Respondent:
United States of America and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duarte-Rodriguez v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50333
Petitioner:
Jose Ulise Duarte-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States Of America and Warden Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07782
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Jackson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv06619
Petitioner:
Sherick Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States Of America v. Brown
as 3:2023cv50312
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Floyd Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Taylor v. United States
as 3:2023cv50308
Petitioner:
Ryan Taylor
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05339
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States of America v. Hernandez
as 1:2023cv05453
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mario Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Cancino
as 1:2023cv05137
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amado Estevez Cancino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Kimble
as 1:2023cv05074
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Johnny Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
