Cases 51 - 59 of 59
JACKSON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2008cv00930
Plaintiff:
STANLEY JACKSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACKSON v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00564
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES JACKSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACKSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv00408
Plaintiff:
AINSWORTH C. JACKSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J.E. HARRELL, GEO GROUP, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JACKSON v. PONDS et al
as 1:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD L. JACKSON
Defendant:
BILLY L. PONDS, MICHELLE ANAPOL and JOSEPH CONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv00026
Petitioner:
MERVIN JACKSON
Respondent:
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D.C. PAROLE BOARD, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JACKSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01184
Plaintiff:
DEREK JACKSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ALBERTO GONZALES, HECTOR LEDESMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUMONDE v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LAFITTE DUMONDE
Defendant:
R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, MICHAEL B. BILLINGSLEY, SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HILL v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2007cv00483
Plaintiff:
HENRY LEE HILL
Defendant:
D. WRIGHT, TIMOTHY S. CRAGGETTE, EUGENE EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
