Cases 51 - 60 of 84
SUBLET v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00961
Petitioner:
DONALD SUBLET
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00941
Petitioner:
RENARD DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN and FRANCISCO QUINTANA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HINOJOSA v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00860
Plaintiff:
CARLOS JORGE HINOJOSA
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHEAL T. SHELBY, HILDA TAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PURVEEGIIN v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00737
Plaintiff:
BATSAIHAN PURVEEGIIN
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, DICK CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUMONDE v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LAFITTE DUMONDE
Defendant:
R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, MICHAEL B. BILLINGSLEY, SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NEAL v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00610
Petitioner:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REYNOLDS v. MINER et al
as 1:2007cv00663
Petitioner:
KEITH REYNOLDS
Respondent:
JOHNATHAN C. MINER and ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REYNOLDS v. RICE et al
as 1:2007cv00532
Petitioner:
KEITH REYNOLDS
Respondent:
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, ALBERTO GONZALES and JONATHAN C. MINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ANTUNEZ v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00556
Petitioner:
ANTHONY CARLOS ANTUNEZ
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
