Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Rexha v. Shanahan et al
as 1:2015cv05365
Petitioner:
Mal Rexha
Respondent:
Christopher Shanahan , Jeh Johnson , Loretta E. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Aviles et al.
as 1:2015cv05089
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles , Jeh Johnson , Loretta E. Lynch and others
Petitioner:
Alexis Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
German v. Green et al
as 1:2015cv04691
Petitioner:
Francisco German
Respondent:
Charles L. Green, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Loretta E. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez Lopez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2015cv04398
Petitioner:
Jackson Lopez Hernandez
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Sarah Saldana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shaaban v. Aviles et al
as 1:2015cv04249
Petitioner:
Amir S. Shaaban
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles , Christopher Shanahan , Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Batheja v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2015cv03977
Plaintiff:
Ranjan Batheja
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security , Jeh Johnson , U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taveras v. Shanahan et al
as 1:2015cv02813
Petitioner:
Humberto Pichardo Taveras
Respondent:
Christopher Shanahan , Jeh Johnson , U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv05579
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch and United States of America
Petitioner:
Antonio Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Whaley v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv05471
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch and The United States of America
Petitioner:
John Whaley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
