Cases 51 - 60 of 955
Brandyn Gayler v. HDSP, et al
as 18-15706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDYN WILLIAM GAYLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Cornelius Gaines, III v. D. Neven, et al
as 18-15653
Petitioner - Appellant:
CORNELIUS A. GAINES III
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jeffrey Depenbrock v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-15606
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT DEPENBROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jose Alvarez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-15516
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE IRAEL ALVAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Rodriguez-Perez v. Neven et al
as 2:2018cv00535
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Neven
Petitioner:
Aurora Rodriguez-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Dulcero v. D. Neven, et al
as 18-15456
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN DOSDOS DULCERO
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Hill v. OMD et al
as 2:2018cv00420
Defendant:
James Cox, James Dzurenda, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv00337
Defendant:
Marlyn Alamillo, Vironica L Banks, Link and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Cox et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Defendant:
C.C. Adams, R. Aranas, Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neven et al
as 2:2018cv00223
Defendant:
SL Clark, D. Neven, Raranas and others
Plaintiff:
Lamarr Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
