Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Lyons v. Williams et al
as 2:2010cv01342
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Phillip J. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyons v. State Of Nevada, et al.
as 2:2010cv00707
Defendant:
Lt. Minor Adams, C/O Baker, Dwayne Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
NOT USED
as 2:2010cv00704
Nominal Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Lyons
Defendant:
State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Neven et al
as 2:2010cv00666
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Dwight Neven
Petitioner:
Vornelius J. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benevento v. Johnson et al
as 2:2010cv00345
:
Defendant:
Johnson, Meiers, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashdown v. Savadera et al
as 3:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ashdown
Defendant:
Savadera, Gargia, P.H.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Palmer et al
as 3:2009cv00377
Petitioner:
David B. Phillips
Respondent:
Jack Palmer and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2009cv01239
Plaintiff:
Phillip B. Harper
Defendant:
State Of Nevada, Nancy Osterly, Karen Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winans v. Dickerman et al
as 3:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cory Winans
Defendant:
Phillip Dickerman, Jack Palmer, Rogelio Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lyons v. Donat et al
as 3:2008cv00288
Petitioner:
Phillip Jackson Lyons
Respondent:
Bill Donat and State of Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
