Cases 51 - 60 of 163
Fletcher v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2016cv00252
Plaintiff:
William Fletcher
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Fox
as 1:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paxton v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
William Paxton
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Gelok et al
as 1:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brandon Savage
Defendant:
Christian Gelok, William Poulson, Agler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. Sandy et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Faron E Lovelace
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, Howard Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storm v. Kempf et al
as 1:2015cv00596
Plaintiff:
Rickie Storm
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Idaho Department of Corrections, Rona Siegert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho
as 1:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C.L. "Butch" Otter, Molley Huskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer v. Poulson et al
as 1:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Meyer
Defendant:
William Poulson, Christian Gelok and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veenstra et al v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Miguel Charles Joyner, Jeffrey Boyd Ash and others
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Idaho Department of Correction, Debbie Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
