Cases 61 - 70 of 104
John Odoms v. NDOC Utilization Review Panel, et al
as 13-16459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. ODOMS
Defendant - Appellee:
NDOC UTILIZATION REVIEW PANEL, JAMES COX, BRUCE BANNISTER and others
Wilgus v. Bannister
as 3:2013cv00368
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Bellanger, J. Buchanan and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Everett Wilgus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Csech v. Gedney et al
as 3:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Robert Richard Csech
Defendant:
Karen Gedney, Nathan L. Hastings and Stephen D. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McDonald v. Olivas et al
as 3:2013cv00240
Defendant:
Allen, Ball, R. Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Wells et al
as 3:2013cv00228
Defendant:
Remeo S. Aranas, Robert Bannister, Karen Gedney and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Gates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Odoms v. NDOC Utilization Review Panel et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, James Cox, Director of Nursing and others
Plaintiff:
J. Benjamin Odoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odoms v. NDOC Utilization Review Panel et al
as 3:2013cv00181
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, James Cox, Director of Nursing and others
Plaintiff:
J. Benjamin Odoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher O'Neill v. Robert Bannister, et al
as 13-15305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER O'NEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BANNISTER, KAREN GEDNEY, MARSHA JOHNS and others
Chris O'Neill v. Robert Bannister, et al
as 13-15251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS O'NEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PEERY, Dr., SUSAN SNIDER, Dr., KAREN GEDNEY, Dr. and others
Plummer v. Bannister et al
as 3:2012cv00528
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Karen Gedney, Marsha Johns and others
Plaintiff:
Colvin Plummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
