Cases 71 - 80 of 84
REYNOLDS v. MINER et al
as 1:2007cv00319
Petitioner:
KEITH REYNOLDS
Respondent:
JONATHAN MINER and ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv00309
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HILL
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGUIRRE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00267
Petitioner:
JORGE AGUIRRE
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JIHAD v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
ABDUL NASIR JIHAD
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEVAREZ v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00226
Petitioner:
ARNOLD NEVAREZ
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DOYE v. GONZALES
as 1:2007cv00211
Plaintiff:
IRVIN S. DOYE
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMP v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00224
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PHILIP CAMP, JR.
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEREZ v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00159
Petitioner:
LAZARO F. PEREZ, SR.
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALENZUELA v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00134
Petitioner:
BENNIE VALENZUELA, JR.
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
