Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Hernandez v. Canyon Prosecutors et al
as 1:2009cv00323
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Hernandez
Defendant:
Canyon Prosecutors, Idaho State Police, Caldwell Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Canyon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2009cv00320
Plaintiff:
Robert P McDaniel, Jr
Defendant:
Canyon County Sheriff's Department, City of Caldwell Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saucedo v. Third Judicial District Court Canyon County
as 4:2009cv00294
Petitioner:
Rochelle Saucedo
Respondent:
Third Judicial District Court Canyon County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Caldwell Police et al
as 1:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Hector Hernandez
Defendant:
Caldwell Police, Canyon County, Homedale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2009cv00220
Petitioner:
Alfonso Hernandez
Respondent:
Canyon County, Canyon County Commissioners, Canyon County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lechuga v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2009cv00104
Petitioner:
Arturo Lechuga
Respondent:
Canyon County and Canyon County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Howard v. Canyon County
as 1:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
Canyon County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. Canyon County, State of Idaho
as 1:2008cv00358
Plaintiff:
Shane Elloyd Romero
Defendant:
Canyon County, State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aniceto Betancourt v. Canyon County
as 08-35390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANICETO BETANCOURT
Defendant - Appellee:
CANYON COUNTY
Betancourt v. Canyon County
as 08-35134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANICETO BETANCOURT
Defendant - Appellee:
CANYON COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
