Cases 71 - 80 of 10,308
MICHEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MICHEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mizrachy, Michael v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60588
Plaintiff:
Michael Mizrachy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rendon, Daniela v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21344
Plaintiff:
Daniela Rendon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Marvin Mitchell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith, James Leonard v. United States Of America
as 9:2024cv80194
Plaintiff:
James Leonard Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE J WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabeza, Leonel v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv20787
Plaintiff:
Leonel Garcia Cabeza
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Navas Feliciano v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Adal Antonio Navas Feliciano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mitchell v United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60346
Defendant:
James Irwin Mitchell and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Navas Feliciano v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Adal Antonio Navas Feliciano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
