Cases 71 - 80 of 10,316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rivas Nunez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
Tauri Benjamin Rivas Nunez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gayden v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mirabal v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00493
Petitioner:
James Mirabal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Richardson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
James Kyle Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tejeda-Guerrero v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00624
Petitioner:
Jose Ramon Tejeda-Guerrero
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Michel, Jeffrey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21370
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Michel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Remaley v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Michael Remaley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MICHEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MICHEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mizrachy, Michael v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60588
Plaintiff:
Michael Mizrachy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
