Cases 81 - 90 of 149
Norman v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00187
Petitioner:
Allison Lamont Norman
Respondent:
David Pierce and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Petitioner:
Michael Neal
Respondent:
David Pierce and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brewer v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00023
Petitioner:
Phillip L. Brewer
Respondent:
G.R. Johnson and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00019
Petitioner:
Michael Rodriguez
Respondent:
David Pierce and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Short v. Caple et al
as 1:2013cv01889
Petitioner:
Lakisha Short
Respondent:
Wendi Caple and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Delaware State Police et al
as 1:2013cv01675
Plaintiff:
Jamarr L. Campbell
Defendant:
Delaware State Police, Larry Smith, Adam Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv01401
Petitioner:
Cyril D. McCray
Respondent:
Philip Morgan and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Garner v. Supreme Court of the United S, et al
as 13-5120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lee Garner
Defendant - Appellee:
Supreme Court of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, President, George H.W. Bush, Former President and others
GARNER v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE GARNER
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockley v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00457
Petitioner:
Sylvester Shockley
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, State Of Delaware and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
