Cases 81 - 90 of 225
Skenandore v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00330
Petitioner:
Jonathan Joe Skenandore and Jonathan Haber Skenandore
Respondent:
Perry Russell, Charles Daniels and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Macias v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jose Diaz Macias
Defendant:
Perry Russell, Charles Daniels and Home Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skinner v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00318
Petitioner:
Roderick Skinner
Respondent:
Perry Russell and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCaskill v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D. McCaskill and Jeremy Dale McCaskill
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Christene Evans, Perry Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Amico v. Althousen et al
as 3:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Donald D'Amico
Defendant:
Peter Althousen, Sasha Manning, Michael Minev, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahe v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jason A Mahe
Defendant:
Perry Russell, Robert Hartman, Brian Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Entsminger v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gregory West Entsminger
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Olivia Agle, Russ Alfano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. NNCC et al
as 3:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Terrance E. Williams
Defendant:
NNCC, Perry Russell and Bikasan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00277
Defendant:
Dr. Naughton, Nurse Sean, John Keast and others
Plaintiff:
Terry James Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
