Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jarvis v. Nye County et al
as 2:2013cv00394
Defendant:
Tony DeMeo, Rick Marshall and Nye County
Plaintiff:
Danny Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonso v. Jarvis et al
as 2:2013cv00106
Petitioner:
Julio David Alphonso
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Tamyra Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alphonso v. Jarvis et al
as 2:2012cv02035
Petitioner:
Julio David Alphonso
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Florida and Tamyra Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Everett v. Marshall et al
as 2:2012cv01783
Plaintiff:
Tyrus E Everett
Defendant:
F W Jarvis and Richard Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Earnest et al
as 2:2009cv00378
Plaintiff:
Danny Jarvis
Defendant:
Jason Earnest, Christine L. Olver and Jesse Martinez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jarvis v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 2:2009cv00349
Petitioner:
Danny Joseph Jarvis
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jarvis v. Nye County Sheriffs et al
as 2:2008cv01404
Plaintiff:
Danny Jarvis
Defendant:
Nye County Sheriffs, Martines, Sgt. Rising and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jarvis v. Department Of Motor Vehicles et al
as 2:2008cv01471
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Jarvis
Defendant:
Department Of Motor Vehicles, DMV and Nevada State Bar
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jarvis v. Nye County et al
as 2:2008cv01472
Plaintiff:
Danny Jarvis
Defendant:
Nye County, Nye County Road Department and Nevada State Bar
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jarvis et al v. Nye County Detention et al
as 2:2008cv01482
Plaintiff:
Laura Lynn Jarvis and Danny Jarvis
Defendant:
Nye County Detention and Nye County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
