Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wooten v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Warden
as 1:2022cv00101
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Assistant Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Karla Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 2:2022cv00097
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Karla Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Women's Center Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Karla Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hot Springs County Jail
as 2:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
Tim Mitchell
Defendant:
Hot Springs County Jail, Hot Springs County Jail Administrator and Lou Failgou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Weischedel et al
as 1:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
James E Pearson
Defendant:
Scott Weischedel, Jack Killey, Tim Hill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford v. Johnson et al
as 2:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Ford
Defendant:
Emerald Correctional Management LLC, Tim Johnson, Jill Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00206
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
