Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Thompson v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Kami Keahi Thompson
Defendant:
State of Hawaii and City & County of Honolulu
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2019cv00339
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Petitioner:
James Thompson
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, John Edwards, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. 425 Park South Tower Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Jose "Perez", Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Rissa et al
as 1:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Thad Thompson
Defendant:
Rissa, Charlotte, Irina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Halawa Correctional Facility Plumbing Dept. Supervisor et al.
as 1:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Thad Thompson
Defendant:
Plumbing Department Supervisor and Capt. Paleka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
