Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Martinez v. Discrimination from Texas and from New York (and from Mexico City Federal District of Mexico) due to nancy McManus's
as 1:2007cv01117
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination from Texas and from New York (and from Mexico City Federal District of Mexico) due to nancy McManus's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. Discrimination
as 1:2007cv01137
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. Discrimination (Unable to work) and Discrimination from Texas
as 1:2007cv01115
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination (Unable to work) and Discrimination from Texas
Consolidated Defendant:
Perhaps discrimination of girlfriends and perhaps of discrimination of child years confussions, Discrimination from Texas and from New York (and from Mexico City Federal District of Mexico) due to nancy McManus's, Discrimination from Florida Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. Discrimination
as 1:2007cv01125
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination
Consolidated Defendant:
perhaps from methodical beliefs whom may have ruled against my grandfather from a magistrates court ruling against his estate/household lineage of heirs to his right or within his household main me in, Discrimination through New York and Discrimination from the Zapata County Texas and.or their Padilla relatives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. Discrimination and Discrimination from Texas
as 1:2007cv01155
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination and Discrimination from texas perhaps from me and prejudicial time in New York-Manhattan
Consolidated Defendant:
Discrimination and discrimination perhaps of prejudicial time, Discrimination from that Irish character of Irish descent that Attorney General Gonzalez and perhaps that Irish City where I lived in Texas McAllen, Texas and Discrimination from unable to work discrimination from New York people whom have requested my number of celular telephone to make a discovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Martinez v. Discrimination if the entire documents are not sealed today discrimination from Texas and New York
as 1:2007cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination if the entire documents are not sealed today discrimination from Texas and New York
Consolidated Defendant:
Discrimination from Texas to New York perhaps of the false information that I was being bribed according to Texas Hidalgo County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Martinez v. Discrimination from unable to work discrimination from New York people whom have requested my number of celular telephone to make a discovery
as 1:2007cv01157
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination from unable to work discrimination from New York people whom have requested my number of celular telephone to make a discovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Martinez v. Discrimination
as 1:2007cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination
Consolidated Defendant:
Discrimination from Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. Discrimination
as 1:2007cv01126
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. Discrimination
as 1:2007cv01133
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Discrimination
Consolidated Defendant:
Perhaps Discrimination from N.Y. Senators and Discrimination of (2) two New York incidents maybe related to discrimination from Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
