Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Teron Franklin v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERON FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, GOVERNMENT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Franklin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2018cv00522
Defendant:
Mumpower, Clayton, Mesa and others
Plaintiff:
Teron Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teron Franklin v. State of Nevada, et al
as 18-15657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERON FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, GOVERNMENT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Church Jr v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00053
Defendant:
Mike Byrne, Dwayne Deal, Pam Depordo and others
Plaintiff:
Avery Allen Church Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee White v. Bruce Stroud, et al
as 17-17467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE WHITE, AKA Lee A. White, AKA Lee Arthur White
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE STROUD, CULINARY WILSON, VASQUEZ, C/O and others
Garcia v. Stroud et al
as 3:2017cv00711
Petitioner:
Karisma Garcia
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Bruce Stroud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mconald v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv02572
Defendant:
Alvarado, Associate Warden Jennifer Nash, Lt Potter and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarrette v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv02501
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Anthony Ritz, Perry Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Navarrette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00569
Defendant:
AMPD TV MP3 Company, Romeo Aranas, Arguilar and others
Plaintiff:
Teron Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helfrich v. Laxalt et al
as 2:2017cv02392
Respondent:
James Dzurenda, David Gamble, Adam Paul Laxalt and others
Petitioner:
Peter Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
