Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kehano v. Espinda et al
as 1:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Shackley F. Raffetto, Richard T. Bissen, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rapozo v. Bennett
as 1:2010cv00455
Petitioner:
Richard B. Rapozo
Respondent:
Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Kagan et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Petitioner:
David F. Wilson
Respondent:
Elena Kagan, Mark Bennett and R. Hermann Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cutsinger v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00448
Petitioner:
Walter Lee Cutsinger
Respondent:
Clayton A. Frank, Todd Thomas and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. USA
as 1:2009cv00387
Respondent:
USA and USA
Petitioner:
Hamlet C. Bennett, Hamlet C. Bennett and Hamlet C. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00379
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kamana'o v. Frank et al
as 1:2009cv00313
Petitioner:
Andrew Kamana'o
Respondent:
Clayton A. Frank, Nolan Espinda and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schoenlein v. Frank et al
as 1:2008cv00503
Plaintiff:
Grey W. Schoenlein
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Francis Sequiera, Bennett Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Frank et al
as 1:2008cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Francis Sequiera, Bennett Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Frank et al
as 1:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Opherro G. Jones
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Francis Sequiera, Bennett Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
