Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Musgrove et al v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv00546
Defendant:
Chuck Windor, Candie M. Burgess-Shell, Terry Kirkham and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore E Musgrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00416
Defendant:
John Doe Bobiner, T. Valley, Klinton R. Hust and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Klinton R. Hust, Josh Tewalt, T. Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musgrove v. Parole Board Commission of Idaho et al
as 1:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
Theodore E Musgrove
Respondent:
Ross, Scott Brow, Parole Board Commission of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00391
Respondent:
Tyrell Davis
Petitioner:
John C. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laine v. Donahue, et al.
as 1:2024cv00329
Defendant:
Russell Donnelly, Kieran Donahue, Hammond and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gordon Laine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruck v. Ada County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Scott C Bruck
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Office, Greater Idaho Fugitive Task Force, Ada County Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Nye
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Winmill et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
B Lynn Winmill, Amanda K. Brailsford and David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Anaya
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Davis Davis
Defendant:
C/O Anaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
