Cases 1 - 10 of 81
VASS v. BRAWNER
as 1:2024cv00723
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER A. VASS
Respondent:
RONALD BRAWNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2023cv03117
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FOSTER v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FOSTER
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANG v. WRAY
as 1:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
ROBERT MANG
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SHEPHARD v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02228
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CLAYTON v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01631
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CLAYTON
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, MICHELLE MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv01152
Not Classified By Court:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH QUAGLIN
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
QUAGLIN v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01154
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH QUAGLIN
Respondent:
US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, Superintendent NNRJ TED HULL, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv01151
Not Classified By Court:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH QUAGLIN
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
