Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GASTONG v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
HARRELL ANTHONY GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
SULLIVAN M., PAGE M., KABAH M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RICHARD L. BUTLER, JR. v. ALL AFRICAN IMMIGRANTS et al
as 1:2021cv02187
In Re:
RICHARD L. BUTLER, JR.
Defendant:
ALL AFRICAN IMMIGRANTS, CLEMENT A. OBENG and MONISOLA MUSTAPHA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVE et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE, VINCENT DALE ROSS and DYRIAN STRONG
Defendant:
MARY LOU ROBINSON, CLINTON AVERITTE, BARBARA MELYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARBISON v. U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS et al
as 1:2011cv01828
Petitioner:
PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
PRENTICE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN et al
as 1:2008cv00804
Petitioner:
GLENN PRENTICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NA., GEORGE BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POWELL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv00379
Petitioner:
LARRY POWELL
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, R. E. HOLT, DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEHDER RIVAS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv01733
Petitioner:
CARLOS ENRIQUE LEHDER RIVAS
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, PAUL CLEMENT, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUMONDE v. DREW et al
as 1:2007cv00629
Petitioner:
DANIEL LAFITTE DUMONDE
Respondent:
D. DREW, PAUL D CLEMENT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
