Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Cervantes-Sosa v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv23343
Plaintiff:
Humberto Ariel Cervantes-Sosa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cervantes v. Sessions et al
as 3:2019cv00042
Petitioner:
Fausto Gutierrez Cervantes
Respondent:
Marc J. Moore, Jeff Sessions, Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cervantes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Volusia County)
as 6:2018cv01302
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Jorge Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cervante-Sanchez v. United States Of America
as 0:2017cv62301
Plaintiff:
Mario Alberto Cervante-Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez-Cervantes v. United States of America
as 6:2017cv00806
Petitioner:
Alex A. Sanchez-Cervantes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cervantes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00637
Petitioner:
Jorge Cervantes
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cervantes-Sosa v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv21300
Plaintiff:
Humberto Ariel Cervantes-Sosa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cervantes-Sosa v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv20592
Plaintiff:
Humberto Ariel Cervantes-Sosa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cervantes-Barberena v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2014cv00275
Petitioner:
Arturo Cervantes-Barberena
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
