Cases 1 - 10 of 34
KEYS v. BARDY et al
as 1:2019cv03597
Plaintiff:
CLAY C. KEYS
Defendant:
DAVID M. BARDY, SEAN R. O'NEILL and JOHN/JANE "DOES"
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DAVID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. DAVID
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF HAWAII et al
as 1:2016cv01363
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID IGE, STATE OF GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01044
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. YOUNG
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01623
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
YOUNG v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv00412
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. YOUNG
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS , US MARSHAL SERVICE , GEORGE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHANI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv00904
Petitioner:
ABDUL GHANI
Respondent:
BARACK H. OBAMA, ROBERT M. GATES, DAVID M. THOMAS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MOHAMMAD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv00873
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA FARAJ MOHAMMAD
Respondent:
BARACK H. OBAMA, ROBERT M. GATES, DAVID M. THOMAS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AL QYATI et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv02019
Petitioner:
ABDUL RAHMAN UMIR AL QYATI and SAAD MASIR MUKBL AL AZANI
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, ROBERT M. GATES, DAVID M. THOMAS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
