Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Paz v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Federico Paz
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Adrian Paz, Tom Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. USA
as 1:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
Judd Evans Ballard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paz v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2021cv00210
Defendant:
SGT Tom Evans, State of Idaho, SGT Santos Garza JR and others
Plaintiff:
Federico Paz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Page, et al.
as 1:2020cv00289
Defendant:
Officer Galegar, Cade Hammer, Rizzo Seelys and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
Zachary Tyler Allen
Respondent:
State of Idaho, Brad Little, Idaho Attorney Genrell and others
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Sgt Taylor Wilson, Lt. Hust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Hogan and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Kevin Kempf, Jeff Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Morgan
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Brent Reinke, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Reinke et al
as 1:2014cv00477
Plaintiff:
Steven A Peterson
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Richard Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allison v. Reinke et al
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Gary Eugene Allison
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Rona Siegert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
James N Clark
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J R Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
