Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Morton v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Paris Morton
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Frederick Hutson doing business as Piqeonly, Las Vegas Metro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 2:2019cv01408
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frederick Vernon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ciolino v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv00520
Plaintiff:
Stephen Frederick Paul Ciolino
Defendant:
Kane, Naphcare Corp, John Keast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. USA
as 2:2018cv00767
Petitioner:
Jermaine Xavier Frederick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Caery v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00730
Plaintiff:
Frederick L Caery
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center and Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2017cv02629
Respondent:
ATF, Central Intelligence Agency, DHS and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Warden et al
as 3:2017cv00452
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Cessar et al
as 2:2017cv01988
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
