Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Quezada v. Olsen et al
as 3:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez-Quezada
Respondent:
Kyle Olsen and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Voss v. Kyle Olsen, et al
as 22-16557
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN FLOYD VOSS
Respondent / Appellee:
KYLE OLSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lamartice Wright v. Kyle Olsen, et al
as 22-16456
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMARTICE WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
KYLE OLSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Hughes v. Russell
as 3:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Philip Hughes
Respondent:
Kyle Olsen and Perry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Voss v. Olsen et al
as 3:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Steven Floyd Voss
Respondent:
Kyle Olsen, Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Voss v. Olsen et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Steven Floyd Voss
Defendant:
Kyle Olsen and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Joaquin L Gibson
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels, Kyle Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oglesby v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2021cv01102
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Attorney General State of Nevada and Kyle Olsen
Plaintiff:
Jevon Rynell Oglesby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sandefur v. Olsen
as 3:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Bradley Sandefur
Defendant:
Kyle Olsen
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
