Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lewis v. Ivy Medical
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jermaine Lewis
Defendant:
Ivy Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoak v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Hoak
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Centurion Health Care, Corizon Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grove v. Carlin
as 3:2017cv00306
Petitioner:
Stacey Lewis Grove
Respondent:
Terema Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Ramirez
as 1:2015cv00041
Petitioner:
Derek Lewis
Respondent:
Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. US Marshal Service et al
as 1:2013cv00466
Petitioner:
Perry Lee Lewis
Respondent:
US Marshal Service, United States of America and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abbott v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Abbott
Defendant:
Brian Lewis, Shell Fisher and Ashley Dowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Idaho Corrections Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lewis Walker
Defendant:
Idaho Corrections Corporation and Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monson v. Corizon et al
as 1:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Timm Lewis Monson
Defendant:
Corizon, Scott Lossmann, Cynthia Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2010cv00011
Defendant:
Nancy Alyk, Katherine Livi, Debra Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes, Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Lonnie L Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00632
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, Jimmy T. Glass, Patrick K. Knight and others
Defendant:
State of Idaho, State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
