Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Steele (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv01792
Plaintiff:
Lamar Ray Steele and Lamar Ray Steele, Jr.
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. RealCheapJordans.com
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
RealCheapJordans.com, Maxim (Magazine) and Slam (Magazine)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Gregory
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
Jordan Jackson Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. People of the State of Colorado
as 1:2023cv00683
Petitioner:
Lamar Atu Blackwell
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Gregory
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
Jordan Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. United States Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv03317
Petitioner:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
United States Dept. of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, E. Conorer and Ausp Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barclay v. Choate
as 1:2022cv03323
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamar Barclay
Respondent:
J. Choate and Choate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Elder et al
as 1:2022cv02523
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wright
Defendant:
William Elder, Samuel Zordel, Colorado Springs Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Maxim
as 1:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Lamar Davis
Defendant:
Maxim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Haseneck et al
as 1:2021cv03260
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant:
Heather Haseneck, Sarah Good, Heather Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
