Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Neal v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Antonio Neal
Defendant:
Warden Davis, DW Tyvan, Lane Chow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Meridian Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilkins
Defendant:
Meridian Police Department, Andrew Herscowitz, Kenneth Cayle Kohring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan, et al. v. Bannock County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Sullivan, Theodore James Sullivan, Robin Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Bannock County, Kootenai County, Elmore County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Ankenbrandt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Bowman
Defendant:
Ankenbrandt, Ahlm, Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. ISCI Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00115
Respondent:
Al Ramirez and ISCI Warden
Petitioner:
Michael Lane Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brakke v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Randolph E Brakke, Sr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections , ISCI, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Blades
as 1:2008cv00442
Petitioner:
Michael Max Lane
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sallee v. Stander et al
as 1:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
Randy Sallee
Defendant:
- Stander, Tom Heignst, Linda Young and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. IDOC et al
as 4:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Laura Ashley Wilson
Defendant:
IDOC, Brian Underwood, Tony Campa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCormack v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2007cv00518
Plaintiff:
Robert J McCormack
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, - Manwaring, - Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
