Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Arthur E. Mallory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tom v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
Lane Charlie Tom
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. State of Nevada
as 3:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael V Lane
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Lane, Sr.
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Core Civic, NDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helfrich v. CQV Trust, et al
as 2:2019cv00524
Respondent:
Stephen F. Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford, David Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Jason Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marcelli v. Drakulich et al
as 3:2015cv00104
Defendant:
Paul Drakulich and Lane R Mills
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Marcelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane, III v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and Dwight Neven
Petitioner:
Charles Lane, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv00543
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Charles Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White et al v. Hanke et al
as 3:2007cv00255
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee White, Allen Halling, James Wright and others
Defendant:
David Hanke, Robert Larkin, Pete Sferrazza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
