Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Chattin v. Malik et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joshua Chattin
Defendant:
John Malik, Unknown E & O Insurer and John S. Malik Law Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. GDWG Law Firm et al
as 1:2020cv01394
Plaintiff:
William J. Webb, Jr.
Defendant:
GDWG Law Firm and Dade Werb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abbatiello v. Legrow et al
as 1:2020cv00586
Defendant:
Matthew Keating, Brian Daly, T-Mobile U.S.A Law Enforcement Relations and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Abbatiello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Chapman et al
as 1:2020cv00270
Plaintiff:
William J. Webb, Jr.
Defendant:
Law Offices of Brian J. Chapman and Brian J. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law v. Pierce et al
as 1:2019cv00924
Defendant:
Commissioner Perry Phelps, Warden David Pierce and Warden Dana Metzger
Plaintiff:
Darrell Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law v. MaCauley et al
as 1:2018cv01692
Defendant:
Justice Strine, Thomas MaCauley, Nicole Hartman and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law v. Metzger et al
as 1:2018cv00818
Petitioner:
Darrell Law
Respondent:
Dana Metzger and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laws v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv00864
Petitioner:
Davern Laws
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Alan Grinstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Law et al v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Darrell Law, Arthur Baugh, Artie Pratt and others
Defendant:
Pierce, Fowler, Warren and others
Movant:
Marcus Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Merson, et al
as 1:2013cv00968
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, White American Cowgirls and Cowboys and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Defendant:
Irse M. Merson, Grievance Chairpersons Office Personnel, Mental Health Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
