Cases 1 - 10 of 33
HAZEL v. LYNCH
as 1:2017cv00290
Petitioner:
BOBBY E. HAZEL
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BERRY v. HOLLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Defendant:
J.C. HOLLAND and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARRERO v. STATE OF ILLINOIS et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MARRERO
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, STATE OF ILLINOIS GOVERNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02395
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURGESS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02272
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, EBAY, INC. and PAYPAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH
as 1:2016cv02195
Petitioner:
GREGORY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OMRAN v. COMEY et al
as 1:2016cv02171
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED ABDALLAH OMRAN
Defendant:
JAMES COMEY, TIMOTHY MOYNIHAN, SARAH SALDANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CISNEROS v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2016cv02095
Plaintiff:
JUAN GABRIEL CISNEROS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ANDREW S. HANEN, CHARLES E. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2016cv02055
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEDERAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION, DANE R. GILLETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
