Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nelson v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections, P. Hernandez, S. Moskoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
State of Nevada, NDOC, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Moskoff et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Moskoff, Pickens, Cooke and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Rowley et al
as 3:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Cory Rowley, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Timothy Filson, C. Rowley, John Borrowman and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Boyd et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
J. Boyd, Sgt. Miller and Sgt. Moskoff
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dashaun Wright v. Gonzalas Arias, et al
as 17-17374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DASHAUN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
GONZALAS ARIAS, JAYSON ARTINGER, DOMINIC STURGEON-BEZOLTE and others
Wright v. Arias et al
as 3:2016cv00437
Defendant:
Gonzalas Arias, Jayson Artinger, Boone-Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Dashaun Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Edwards et al
as 3:2016cv00419
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Edwards, Moskoff and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron K. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatlen v. Cox
as 3:2015cv00086
Defendant:
Aranis, Baker, Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
