Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
JOHNSON et al v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01642
Plaintiff: ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. HOLDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00046
Plaintiff: ZACHARY JOHNSON and RUSSELL KEITH HILL
Defendant: ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., JIM HOOD, MICHAEL T. PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02067
Plaintiff: MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and PHYLLIS PYLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIER et al v. MADACHY et al
as 1:2008cv00719
Petitioner: DOROTHY DIER and JERRY L. DIER
Respondent: PHYLLIS MADACHY, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, PEGGY RIGHTENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DIER et al v. MADACHY et al
as 1:2008cv00002
Petitioner: DOROTHY DIER and JERRY L. DIER
Respondent: PHYLLIS MADACHY, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, PEGGY RIGHTENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DIER et al v. MADACHY et al
as 1:2007cv01637
Petitioner: DOROTHY DIER and JERRY L. DIER
Respondent: PHYLLIS MADACHY, DENNIS SWEENEY, SUMMIT PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIER et al vs. MADACHY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00106
Plaintiff: DOROTHY DIER and JERRY L. DIER
Defendant: PHYLLIS MADACHY and DENNIS SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?