Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mora v. C. Chestnut et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Martin Xavier Mora
Defendant:
C. Chestnut, Mr. D'Amico and Dr. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. USMS Jefferson et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Scott Lowe
Defendant:
USMS Jefferson and Dr. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. USA
as 3:2019cv00591
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Surjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Singh-Sidhu v. USA
as 3:2017cv00111
Petitioner:
Iqbal Singh-Sidhu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Krukowski v. United States et.al,
as 2:2016cv02445
Respondent:
Robert Berg, Clark County, Clark County Detention Center and others
Petitioner:
Ashton Krukowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fasthorse et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv01858
Defendant:
District Attorney of Clark County, Sheriff Clark County and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse, Gill Singh Gurpender, Christian Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krukowski v. LVMPD et al
as 2:2016cv01701
Defendant:
Robert Berg, Jason Cunningham, Emerald Suites Hotel and others
Plaintiff:
Ashton Krukowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Mineral County Justice Court
as 3:2014cv00552
Respondent:
Mineral County Justice Court
Petitioner:
Raj Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Foster et al
as 3:2013cv00044
Defendant:
Sheryl Foster, G. Garbeay, Legrand and others
Plaintiff:
Mohinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Reed et al
as 3:2010cv00567
Defendant:
Crone, Rogelio A. Herrera, Jack Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Mohinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
