Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
John Miguel Swan
Respondent:
Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant:
Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Charles R Bowlds
Defendant:
Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Tim Laughlin, Cindy Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isham v. Stephens County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Pete Isham
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyre v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tyre
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elix v. Vann et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey Elix
Defendant:
Timothy Vann, Wayne McKinney and Stephens County SFDP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kelly
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail, Heather LNU, Sean LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coplen v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Norman Coplen
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail, Duncan Police Department, Michael Elroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Stephens County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Juan Demetrius Hill and Juan-D Hill
Defendant:
Stephens County Sheriff, Oklahoma Attorney General, Govenor Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
