Cases 1 - 10 of 24
MEARS-DAVIS et al v. HAND
as 5:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MEARS-DAVIS and STEVE MEARS
Defendant:
CARLA A HAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
Ramone Shirley
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Watts v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2021cv62154
Plaintiff:
Darius Watts
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office and Deputy Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv01765
Petitioner:
Shirley Daniels
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newell v. Snider et al
as 2:2015cv14415
Petitioner:
Nairn D. Newell
Respondent:
D. Snider, Inspector Carter, K. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv01854
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, HuLane E. George, Joy D. Honeycut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Shirley et al
as 0:2013cv62480
Plaintiff:
Lazaro E Cruz
Defendant:
B Shirley, P Bradley, S McGourty and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyette v. Department of Corrections State of Florida
as 3:2013cv00895
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Boyette
Defendant:
Department of Corrections State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00817
Petitioner:
Shirley Robinson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00315
Petitioner:
Shirley Robinson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
