Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Matuguina v. City of Boise, et al.
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brian John Matuguina
Defendant:
City of Boise, Boise Police Department, Kip Paporello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman, et al. v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Justin Bowman, Avorie Rodriguez and Kenneth Terry
Defendant:
Officer Octavio Diaz, Officer Tyler Shropshire, Officer Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ullom v. Armstrong
as 2:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
Terry Glen Ullom
Respondent:
Glen Armstrong and Warden Glen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrick v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Bree Derrick, Ross Castleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Dr Summer Eldridge et al
as 1:2021cv00130
Defendant:
Bob Whitely, Jennette Lindor, Lt Vernon and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ensminger v. State of Idaho
as 1:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Terry Ensminger
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Idaho State Board of Correction, et al.
as 1:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Walter Campbell, Mark Way, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storm v. McClusky et al
as 1:2019cv00214
Defendant:
Campbell, Board of Corrections, Ross Caselton and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie Storm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kesling v. Tewalt, et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Stephanie Trobock, Noel Barlow-Hust and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Kesling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
Tyler Nicodemus, Matthew Lee Alexander and Terry Rasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
