Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ferguson v. Colon et al
as 1:2014cv22036
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Ferguson
Defendant:
Jose Colon, Timothy P. Ryan and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv21863
Defendant:
Samuel Smith , Yvonne Challanger , Elizabeth Cobara and others
Plaintiff:
E-Yage Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bowens v. Ryan et al
as 1:2013cv23341
Plaintiff:
E-Yage Bowens
Defendant:
Timothy P. Ryan and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bowens v. The State of Florida et al
as 1:2013cv21704
Plaintiff:
E-Yage Bowens
Defendant:
The State of Florida and Timothy P. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowens v. Ryan et al
as 1:2012cv23456
Plaintiff:
E-Yage Bowens
Defendant:
Timothy P. Ryan, D. Coffey, Miami Dade County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingcade v. Parker et al
as 1:2012cv23426
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ernest Kingcade
Defendant:
Robert L. Parker, Timothy P. Ryan, Victor Headly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Ryan et al
as 1:2011cv22550
Plaintiff:
Gus Lanier
Defendant:
Timothy P. Ryan, Barbara Jordan, Alina T. Hudak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean-Marie v. Miami-Dade County Corrections & Rehabilatation Department et al
as 1:2011cv21145
Plaintiff:
Frantzy Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County Corrections & Rehabilatation Department, Timothy P. Ryan, John Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean-Marie v. Ryan et al
as 1:2011cv20790
Plaintiff:
Frantzy Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Timothy P. Ryan, Joseph Neubauer and Eric S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lainer v. Ryan et al
as 1:2011cv20745
Plaintiff:
Gus Lainer
Defendant:
Timothy P. Ryan, Dennis C. Moss, George M. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
