Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aniades v. New York Post et al.
as 1:2021cv05975
Plaintiff:
Christopher Aniades
Defendant:
The City of New York Department of Corrections, New York State Division of Parole, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cano v. Cohen et al
as 1:2018cv11550
Defendant:
Robert T. Johnson, Michael Tannousis, Eddie Small and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cano v. Cohen et al
as 1:2018cv10712
Defendant:
Michael Tannousis, Eddie Small, Khaleeq Middleton and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. The New York Post Newspaper
as 1:2018cv09653
Defendant:
The New York Post Newspaper, Corrections Officer Frazier, Nurse Administrators and others
Plaintiff:
William Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elleby v. New York Post et al
as 1:2014cv01323
Plaintiff:
Taye Elleby
Defendant:
New York Post, Frank Rosario and Daniel Prendergast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Olivo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jose Olivo
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York Post, Jose Criollo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06920
Plaintiff:
Jose Olivo
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York Post, John Doe # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salaam v. Gaggiano et al
as 1:2010cv02944
Defendant:
Dr. Bannerman, M.D., Dr. E. Brathwaite, M.D., John Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Aziz Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salaam v. Gaggiano et al
as 1:2010cv04727
Plaintiff:
Aziz Salaam
Defendant:
Gaggiano, Tuft, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. New York Post et al
as 1:2008cv05777
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
New York Post, New York Dailey News, Kathianne Boniello and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
