Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Webb-El v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2019cv00774
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-El
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bruscino v. True et al
as 1:2015cv02845
Petitioner:
Ronnie Bruscino
Respondent:
True and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Starman et al
as 1:2012cv00881
Petitioner:
Jesus John Hernandez
Respondent:
Joe Starman and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. United State Parole Commission Examiner for Florence et al
as 1:2010cv02952
Plaintiff:
Rafael Garcia
Defendant:
United State Parole Commission Examiner for Florence and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DeWilliams v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2010cv00072
Petitioner:
Gary DeWilliams
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gabriel v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2008cv01495
Plaintiff:
Julian Peter Gabriel
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hernandez v. Davis et al
as 1:2007cv02406
Petitioner:
Jesus John Hernandez
Respondent:
Blake Davis and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cota v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2007cv00851
Petitioner:
David Salvador Cota
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thunder v. Gallegos, et al
as 1:2001cv01965
Petitioner:
James Blue Thunder
Respondent:
E. J. Gallegos, E. Maureen Janssen, U.S. Parole Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Szymanski v. USPC, et al
as 1:2000cv01232
Petitioner:
Eugene Szymanski
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission , Janet Reno , United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
