Cases 1 - 10 of 4,210
Rivera v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03976
Plaintiff:
Jason Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Perez Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Ovidio Perez Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04312
Petitioner:
Demark Dixon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Short v. United States America
as 1:2024cv03976
Plaintiff:
Steven Short
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pagan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv04095
Petitioner:
Wilson Pagan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Darge v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03963
Plaintiff:
Patrick H Darge
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Janczuk v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03754
Plaintiff:
Weronika Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03749
Plaintiff:
Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03761
Plaintiff:
Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
