Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Glover v. Shaver et al
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Glover
Defendant:
Shalon Shaver, Mark Davis, Michelle Walker and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doepner v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2020cv00111
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Doepner
Defendant:
Joshua Cox, State of Utah, Rodrigo Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asay v. Daggett County et al
as 2:2018cv00422
Plaintiff:
Joshua Asay
Defendant:
Daggett County, Mike Haddon , Jeffrey Toone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter et al v. Daggett County et al
as 2:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Dustin Law Porter and Steven Drollette
Defendant:
Daggett County, Mike Haddon, Jeffrey Toone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tijerina v. Patterson et al
as 2:2012cv00758
Plaintiff:
Dan Henry Tijerina, Sr
Defendant:
Tom Patterson, FNU Bigelow, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Sorensen
as 2:2011cv00900
Petitioner:
Stephen James Walker
Respondent:
Dennis Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv01155
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Walker
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, FNU Brewer, FNU Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marteny v. Zimmerman et al
as 2:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
James Marteny
Defendant:
FNU Zimmerman and FNU Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Idaho et al
as 2:2008cv00445
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Governor, State of Idaho, Attorney for Governor, State of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Utah Board of Pardons
as 2:2008cv00422
Petitioner:
Monty Kent Walker
Respondent:
Utah Board of Pardons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
