Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Weiskircher v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2024cv00405
Defendant:
Brad Little, Josh Tewalt, Dax Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea May Weiskircher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Paralegal Leeflang et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Defendant:
LT Segadelli, Paralegal Leeflang, Sandi Frelly and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wheiler et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Paralegal Leeflang, D.W. Martinez, A. Hottinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
James Franklin Snyder
Respondent:
Warden Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Chad Page, Director of Wadda Potatoe Farms, Benjamin Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Charee Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Daniel Edward Rodgers
Respondent:
Warden Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branigh v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00247
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson
Plaintiff:
Leotis B Branigh, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orozco v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Lopez Orozco
Defendant:
Warden Randy Valley, Howard, Offsight Surgeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Kent Williams
Respondent:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Steve Young, Warden Richardson, SGT. Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
