Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kull Auction & Real Estate Co., Inc. v. Miller
as 5:2023cv04117
Petitioner:
Kull Auction & Real Estate Co., Inc.
Respondent:
William Miller
Heartland Outdoor, Inc. v. Miller
as 6:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Heartland Outdoor, Inc. doing business as Heartland Outdoor
Respondent:
William J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United States of America v. $77,471.00 in United States Currency
as 6:2020cv01211
Defendant:
$77,471.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Joseph Cassista and Rocky Mountain High Glass Inc.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Ferris Tractor Commercial Tractor SN: 2012708064 et al
as 6:2012cv01250
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ferris Tractor Commercial Tractor SN: 2012708064, Sea Ray HID#SERP4077D898, Fountain SN: FGQ38206D696 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Elderberry juice concentrate
as 6:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Elderberry juice concentrate
Claimant:
Wyldewood Cellars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0331
United States of America v. Direct Security Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv01343
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Direct Security Services, Inc., Steven Dockery and Gary Tidball
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
United States of America v. Metro Treatment Center Inc
as 6:2007cv01303
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Metro Treatment Center Inc
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801 COMPREHENSIVE DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT
United States of America v. Sparhawk Laboratories, Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02332
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sparhawk Laboratories, Inc, Everett Bert Hughes and John U Bascom
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0331 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
