Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LOVERN v. GEITHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01741
Plaintiff:
PRESCOTT LOVERN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER , DAVID S. COHEN , JAMES H. FREIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
CARIK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2012cv00272
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. CARIK , JAMES BEADNELL , JOY BEADNELL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FUNDS TOTALING $496,505.34 et al
as 1:2010cv02147
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FUNDS TOTALING $496,505.34, FUNDS TOTALING $96,525.47, FUNDS TOTALING $153,087.28 and others
Claimant:
THOMAS A. BOWDOIN, JR. and ADSURFDAILY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SCHAUER v. VILSACK
as 1:2010cv01148
Plaintiff:
FRANZ P. SCHAUER
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 8 GILCREASE LANE, QUINCY, FLORIDA 32351 et al
as 1:2008cv01345
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
8 GILCREASE LANE, QUINCY, FLORIDA 32351, ONE CONDO LOCATED ON NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD IN MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA and ALL FUNDS INCLUDING APPROXIMATELY $53 MILLION, ON DEPOSIT AT BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNTS OF (1) THOMAS A. BOWDOIN, JR., , (2) CLARENCE BUSBY, JR. & DAWN STOWERS,& (3) GOLDEN PANDA AD BUILDER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. LIBBY
as 1:2007mc00253
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
I. LEWIS LIBBY
Movant:
VIKRAM AMAR, RANDY E. BARNETT, ROBERT H. BORK and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Intervene
WHITE v. THOMAS SQUARE ASSOCIATES LLC,
as 1:2007mc00019
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D WHITE
Defendant:
THOMAS SQUARE ASSOCIATES LLC,
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
